How terrible "professional" forecasters are at predicting Canadian bond yields and interest rates

Jun 22, 2019
Erik Fertsman

Yesterday, BNN Bloomberg posted a Q&A article that asked a number of professionals what the Bank of Canada would do if the US's Federal Reserve cut interest rates. Would it follow, or does the Bank have some flexibility? 

According to Ed Devlin, head of a Canadian portfolio management firm, Canadian inflation and macroeconomic data is more positive than what the US is facing, and so the Bank of Canada doesn't need to cut rates. Similarly, CIBC's Chief Economist, Ben Tal responded by saying the Bank could leave rates untouched for up to a year considering the economic cycle in Canada has been muted, and Canadian rates are lower than US rates. Even Sherry Cooper, Chief Economist at Dominion Lending Centers believes rate cuts are not necessary for the Canadian central bank, considering the lowest unemployment rate in history, good consumer spending, and rising inflation in Canada. Cooper even thinks that a no-rate-cut by the Bank is already priced into the Canadian dollar.

Meanwhile, TD's senior economist also believes the Bank of Canada can chill: the Fed is cutting for insurance purposes, and to, you know, reduce the risks, but Canada's economy is "healthy." RBC's Josh Nye had a more sophisticated answer: if the Fed was cutting for insurance purposes, then the Bank would hold off, but if the Fed was cutting because of actual economic growth deterioration, then the Bank of Canada would follow. BMO's chief economist and managing director followed his big six bank peers and their answers.

In contrast, Rosenberg, who I've picked apart recently, thinks Canada is a "price-taker" that would cut rates in lockstep with the Fed. Even if the Bank doesn't cut the same day, the Canadian economist has no doubts that Poloz will follow, especially given the bullish pressure a Fed rate-cut would put on the Canadian dollar.

How forecasters failed at predicting the US Fed rate


We need to recall that since before the Fed's announcement earlier this week that it would keep its federal funds rate steady, most of these professionals were betting on a rate cut as I reported here:

It was virtually certain that the Fed would lower rates. Then came the day... but the Fed didn't cut rates...

Last week I had posted a chart on Twitter that demonstrated just how bad folks were at predicting rates for the US. But this wasn't the data that led me to my conclusions- the US's nominal GDP data was the final arbiter.

Just how bad are forecasters at predicting Canadian rates?

Back in January of this year, Bank of Canada staff shared this chart in a note devoted specifically to interest rate forecasting. What they found was that, well, since about the early 2000s forecasters have been expecting interest rates to rise, but they haven't! Turns out, Canadians are no better at forecasting interest rates than US forecasters (hehe).

As you can see, between 2001 and now, interest rates have really not gone the way models have anticipated. This is a big problem for the Bank of Canada because it could impact participation in the Canadian bond market. If yields are unpredictable, then it makes things a bit more risky. That being said, the note did mention how bond profits were still considerable when compared with the stock market within the same period. This makes sense, considering bond prices go up when bond yields go down. Yet, if forecasters are constantly... sorry, but for decades (!), saying "get your mortgage now, get your home refinanced now, before interest rates go up" but rates just keep diving lower, isn't that not benefiting home owners who end up getting locked into higher rates? 

Plus, if you're someone who has followed mortgage rules in Canada, then you probably know that rising interest rate expectations are one of the primary reasons underpinning the stress-test rules that have contributed to the collapse in high-ratio mortgages underwritten by the big six banks and other small lenders. This collapse in mortgage origination has led to price decreases in housing markets across Canada, especially in the more expensive markets like Toronto and Vancouver.

What is to be done about these pesky forecasts?

Well, for starters it's probably worth understanding that interest rates follow nominal GDP growth, or at least it's good record - and logic - suggests that they should. So, if nGDP is forecasted to be lower, then rates should be as well. There is a tiny problem here though, like the fact that GDP forecasting also has a terrible record. Let's just try to remember that nGDP = interest rates, ok?

SHARE THIS ARTICLE


Enjoyed this article and want to support our work, but are using an ad blocker? Consider disabling your ad blocker for this website and/or tip a few satoshi to the address below. Your support is greatly appreciated.

BTC Address: 13XtSgQmU633rJsN1gtMBkvDFLCEBnimJX

SHARE THIS ARTICLE

Most Recent

By Erik Fertsman 09 Nov, 2023
Governments are now starting to realize that solving the housing affordability crisis will require building more homes, and faster than ever before. But how can Canada build lots of homes when the increased levels of investments - particularly bank mortgages - that are needed to build more housing have consistently led to higher housing costs? We've prepared a report that tackles these important questions, and it's available for download at the link below.
By Erik Fertsman 01 Nov, 2022
The tide has clearly turned in Canadian housing. Today, the outlook is markedly worse for housing prices, with price growth now trending downward, inventory starting to build, and demand collapsing further on high financing costs. Looking ahead, national prices could contract on an annualized basis next year in 2023.
Share by: